210419: read somewhere that to understand ‘la nausee’ (nausea) you have to read his philosophy text l’etre et le neante’ (being and nothingness). helpful here, but if you have some sartrean existential sense, read on or of his thought, his themes/assertions, his thoughts/morals etc are evident if not too annoying if you disagree. intro is english english but play is in french. years (decades...) since first read translation but not much change, fun though. quotable. and anyway as the intro notes, this is literature not philosophy...
top of page
Search
Recent Posts
See AllAn Introduction to Henri Bergson 220701: (this is eleven years later reread) recent read (220625)[book:Bergson’s Philosophy of...
410
140718: this is read 3 times. this is the book that made his name. it has been translated but i do not know how: a lot of the pleasure is...
100
if you like this review, i now have website: www.michaelkamakana.com 220611: this is probably the most academically accurate of the...
170
Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page
Yorumlar